Thursday, February 28, 2013

Tax Problems? Consider "The Offer in Compromise"


The IRS is waiting for your money.  What should you do if you can’t afford to pay your current taxes or your taxes for past years?  One way to deal with this is the Offer in Compromise.
As stated by the IRS: “An offer in compromise (“OIC”) is an agreement between a taxpayer and the Internal Revenue Service that settles the taxpayer’s tax liabilities for less than the full amount owed. Absent special circumstances, an offer will not be accepted if the IRS believes that the liability can be paid in full as a lump sum or through a payment agreement.”
So you have to convince the IRS that you will not be able to pay the amount due. As the IRS states: “In most cases, the IRS will not accept an OIC unless the amount offered by the taxpayer is equal to or greater than the reasonable collection potential (RCP). The RCP is how the IRS measures the taxpayer’s ability to pay and includes the value that can be realized from the taxpayer’s assets, such as real property, automobiles, bank accounts, and other property. The RCP also includes anticipated future income, less certain amounts allowed for basic living expenses.”
For the IRS to accept an offer in compromise, there are three grounds:
Per the IRS:
“1. Doubt as to Collectibility - Doubt exists that the taxpayer could ever pay the full amount of tax liability owed within the remainder of the statutory period for collection.
2. Doubt as to Liability - A legitimate doubt exists that the assessed tax liability is correct. Possible reasons to submit a doubt as to liability offer include: (1) the examiner made a mistake interpreting the law, (2) the examiner failed to consider the taxpayer’s evidence or (3) the taxpayer has new evidence.
3. Effective Tax Administration - There is no doubt that the tax is correct and there is potential to collect the full amount of the tax owed, but an exceptional circumstance exists that would allow the IRS to consider an OIC. To be eligible for compromise on this basis, a taxpayer must demonstrate that the collection of the tax would create an economic hardship or would be unfair and inequitable."
To get the process started, generally, you have sent an application fee and your first payment with a Form 656, Offer in Compromise to the IRS.
There are three payment options.
According to the IRS, they are:
“1. Lump Sum Cash Offer - Payable in non-refundable installments, the offer amount must be paid in five or fewer installments upon written notice of acceptance.  A non-refundable payment of 20 percent of the offer amount along with the $150 application fee is due upon filing the Form 656.
If the offer will be paid in 5 or fewer installments in 5 months or less, the offer amount must include the realizable value of assets plus the amount that could be collected over 48 months of payments or the time remaining on the statute, whichever is less.
If the offer will be paid in 5 or fewer installments in more than 5 months and within 24 months, the offer amount must include the realizable value of assets plus the amount that could be collected over 60 months of payments, or the time remaining on the statute, whichever is less.
If the offer will be paid in 5 or fewer installments in more than 24 months, the offer amount must include the realizable value of assets plus the amount that could be collected over the time remaining on the statute.
2. Short Term Periodic Payment Offer - Payable in non-refundable installments; the offer amount must be paid within 24 months of the date the IRS received the offer. The first payment and the $150 application fee are due upon filing the Form 656. Regular payments must be made during the offer investigation. The offer amount must include the realizable value of assets plus the total amount the IRS could collect over 60 months of payments or the remainder of the statutory period for collection, whichever is less.
3. Deferred Periodic Payment Offer - Payable in non-refundable installments; the offer amount must be paid over the remaining statutory period for collecting the tax. The first payment and the $150 application fee are due upon filing the Form 656. Regular payments must be made during the investigation.
The offer amount must include the realizable value of assets plus the total amount the IRS could collect through monthly payments during the remaining life of the statutory period for collection.
The IRS is not bound by either the offer amount or the terms proposed by the taxpayer.  The OIC investigator may negotiate a different offer amount and terms, when appropriate.  The investigator may determine that the proposed offer amount is too low or the payment terms are too protracted to recommend acceptance. In this situation, the OIC investigator may advise the taxpayer as to what larger amount or different terms would likely be recommended for acceptance.”
The information is this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute nor is it intended to constitute legal advice.

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Sue Your Bank....the book


How to Sue your Bank    A new book written by a friend and expert that helps people who were wronged by the banks learn how to sue them without the need of an attorney. 








THIS BLOG HAS BEEN MOVED.  























Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Disappointments in the Housing Market


    One of my biggest disappointments in this decade is how the housing crisis was handled by the government and banks. So many people have suffered as a result of the negligence of the American Government and the greed of the banks. I have been researching the legislative codes in this field and following the trend of the case law and the judges various holdings about specific issues. Unfortunately the American homeowner believes they have no recourse. The banks have thoroughly planned this "loan modification fraud"which they have perpetrated on the American homeowner. They never put anything in writing....all their promises are made on the phone!! The most common scheme trend (my terminology for the fraud fashion of the day for the banks) is one in which the banks draft a "loan modification agreement", send it to the homeowners for the owners to get notarized. The banks then ask for the notarized documents to be sent back to them with a check in the amount of their so reduced monthly payment. The bank NEVER sends the agreement back with a signature. Further, the language of the agreement is very one sided and usually includes a waiver of rights to sue the bank.  The courts find that a contract does not exist due to the lack of a signature by the bank. The bank is not held to their promise to the homeowner.
    It is time for the banks to own up to their responsibility to all American tax payers, because without them, their very existence would be in question today. Due to the lax in the law, American home owners have poured their life savings, livelihood, blood, sweat and tears in to their homes just to watch the it be taken away from them by the very institutions that were saved with tax payer dollars. It is time for the legislature to take action and make the newly written laws called "Homeowners Bill of Rights" which goes into effect in 2012 retro-active, which would give tens of thousands of homeowners a chance to redeem their livelihood and feel they have not been let down by their government. It is our civil duty to not look the other way when it comes to big business corruption and show them we have a voice. That the American public will not stand silent while thousands of families are being torn for the benefit of the few.

THIS BLOG HAS BEEN MOVED.  
Please visit:  http://lawofficesofgoldyberger.com

Friday, August 24, 2012

A home is a terrible thing to lose!


    I have had so many homeowners in my office in disarray due to the banks conduct over the past 4 years that I cannot count. Good people who worked hard, purchased a home and were defrauded and taken advantage of by the banks!!  The fraudulent conduct consist of the following in every case that I have seen: 1) homeowner sees a great modification program on TV 2) homeowner is concerned about future income 3) bank tells homeowner that there are no programs to help them unless they are late on some payments 4)  Homeowner misses payments thinking the bank will not report them in default and foreclose on their property 5)Bank leads homeowner to think they are receiving a loan modification when they are actually moving forward with full foreclosure and eventual sale of their home.  I have numerous lawsuits pending with these facts in court throughout California. Have you experienced this practice by your bank???


THIS BLOG HAS BEEN MOVED.